January 12, 2016
One of the major trends we are seeing is a transition from an institution-centric orientation (what a college wants to say…and do) to an audience-centric orientation (what a student needs and expects).
While this is an important perspective for students of all ages and types, it is especially true for adult and graduate students.
Perhaps the best illustration of this shift is how adult and graduate students define academic quality. In a recent Stamats study we asked adult students to identify what “academic quality” means to them.
Here is what adult students tell us about academic quality:
Compare these results to the narrower and more internally focused components that most colleges use to describe academic quality:
The difference in perspective is readily apparent. One can see the problem that occurs when schools force an institution-centric definition of academic quality or student life on students who insist on a voice, and a role, in their educational experience.
Imagine recruiting adult or graduate students and insisting on using an institution-centric definition of academic quality.
The transition to audience-centricity has huge implications for what is taught, how it is taught, and when it is taught. Ramifications extend to co- and extracurricular activities as well as student retention.
Smart colleges recognize the difference between being institution-centric and audience-centric. Even smarter colleges act on it.